This is one of a number of pages that help us rethink economics, as part of Christian Thinking in Economics.

Multi-aspectual Economics

Treating economic activity as multi-aspectual human functioning offers a different approach, which might address some of the problems of contemporary economic theory and practice. For example, it very naturally incorporates biodiversity and other environmental responsibility into economics without any special tweaking of theory. It can make economics sensitive to ethical and justice issues too.

This page contains examples of how various issues in economics might be seen in a multi-aspectual manner. It is the writings on economics of someone who is not an economist.

CURRENCY

Currency began as economic objects like pieces of silver or gold, or cowrie shells. Here I look at the realities of gold and coins in aspectual terms, identifying the many aspects that are involved. Several benefits arise from such aspectual analysis. (a) We gain a wider perspective, in which the economic aspect is only one among many and depends on the others in order to function properly. (b) We separate out issues clearly so as to understand better. (c) We can see more clearly where things might go wrong, so that we can more precisely target remedial action. (d) We can impart (e.g. teach) better understanding. (e) We can more effectively target economics research, especially on how the economic aspect relates to other aspects.

Coins

Gold has been used as currency for thousands of years. In the early days, several physical things were used as currency - shells, silver, gold, etc. These things were chosen because they were hard to obtain (rare), and probably also because they had some beauty in them. We can immediately see four kinds of aspectual functioning there:

As is widely known, because gold had currency value, gold was scraped off the edge of coins and then sold. This involved all the above except the lingual, in that the gold so sold was a mere high-price commodity rather than carrying symbolic value. At the time, the symbolic and commodity values of gold were similar. However, another aspectual functioning came to the fore:

There was actually juridical functioning in the original use of those objects too, which had been hidden because taken for granted:

Two things happened to coins (in different periods). Coins were given knurled edges. Coins had the image of Caesar stamped on them, to show under what authority there were issues.

Bank Notes and Online Currency

When bank notes were introduced they were originally promises to "pay the bearer on demand the sum of ..." their stated value in gold. This retains the aspectual functioning involved in using coins - social, ethical and pistic functioning - and most of the functions of coinage - economic, lingual, social agreement, juridical authority - but it removes, or at least reduces, the physical functioning of the physical objects being robust and not curruptible.

Bank notes must be robust to last longer, but not in the way that gold or cowrie shells must be. However, another aspect becomes important in the generation of bank notes:

It is this that makes them suitable to be used as currency, in its economic functioning in the limited supply of the objects used as currency.

The lingual aspect became proporionally more important than the physical, which opened the door to lingual functioning without direct dependence on the physical, in keeping currency online. When I have 100 UKP today, this is usually in my bank account, not in coins or notes. The aspects in which online currency functions are similar to those above, but slightly different, and with some missing:

Use of Currency

That is not all, however, as becomes clear when we look at the use of currency (coins, bank notes). Coins were, and still are, used for exchange, to procure goods (including services). When we give coins or currency for some goods, we can see the following aspects in play:

The Gold Standard

What gives currency its value? That is a major topic of Mark Carney's 2021 book, Value(s). One attempt that he discusses is the gold standard. He offers the following explanation of why the gold standard worked at first, and why it subsequently failed. In this, we can see the following aspects:

Carney's text Aspect(s) that make it meaningful
[p.70] There were three factors in particular that reinforced the effectiveness of the system in its early years.
First, the UK's position as the financial and commercial hegemon created large, self-reinforcing synergies. [Hegemon is largely social aspect with a bit of formative power]
The UK was the main [p.71] exporter of capital goods (that is, machinery), [Exonomic, kinematic]
it provided much of the financial capital to fund those imports [Economic with quantitative]
by the emerging economies of the day (from Argentina through to Canada) [Emerging economies function in the social and economic aspect]
and it bought much of their produce. [Economic functioning]
In essense, the UK economy and financial system were oriented to recycle gold back into the global economy for productive investment. [Recycling is economic functgioning; productiveness is economic-formative]
Secondly, with banking systems relatively underdeveloped, [development here is social-formative functioning]
central banks initially faced relatively few conflicts between the requirements of external and internal stability. [aesthetic harmony between the two; stability also has an aesthetic aspect.]
Third, the system was backed by a strong consensus of those active in politics. [Consensus is social functioning; "active in politics" probably refers to not just policy-making, but leading opinion and vision-setting, which is pistic functioning]
The cornerstone of the gold standard was the priority that governments attached to stability and maintaining convertibility. [Attaching priority to something is a commitment, hence pistic functioning]
Initially, there was no doubt that those countries at the centre of the system would 'do whatever it takes' to keep the system stable (does that sound familiar?). [Doing "whatever it takes" would initially be willingness to sacrifice, hence of the ethical aspect, but I get a sense here that there is some cynicism about that, so it is probably its negative, i.e. self-interest]
With the right to vote limited and labour poorly organised (recall the class struggle), workers who suffered the most from the measures [that were] needed to defend currencies were poorly positioned to influence those policies. [juridical aspect of injustice]
As a consequence, central banks could raise interest rates to encourage gold inflows and exert downward pressures on prices and wages that would eventually restore competitiveness and external balance. [Doing something to achieve a given purpose if functioning in the formative aspect. The purpose itself (the target aspect) is mainly economic, but partly quantitative and a little ethical dysfunction in being selfish.]
It helped that wages and prices were relatively flexible, meaning that the required reductions in domestic spending could be delivered primarily through falls in domestic prices and costs rather than increases in unemployment. ["Could be delivered" is formative functioning, but that is not the main meaningfulness of this sentence. The whole sentence seems to describe a mechanism that is meaningful in the economic aspect.]
Pressures on the system built up because all of these factors changed. ...
[p.72] ... the self-equilibrating nature of the systems became less evident ... more frequent tensions between the requirements of external balance ... and internal balance ... [aesthetic functioning in balance. Self-equilibrium is economic functioning that antecipates the aesthetic, without being itself aesthetic.]
[p.73] Survival of the system increasingly depended on cooperation rather than on Hume's automatic adjustment mechanisms. [Cooperation is social functioning. Hume tried to explain adjustment in purely economic terms - though his "invisible hand" might be seen as an allusion to other aspects that make no sense in economic terms.]
A single-minded focus on convertibility to the exclusion of the impacts on the domestic economy, particularly on wages and employment, became increasingly untenable. [Wages and employment etc. here are juridical issues, or doing injustice. The "single-minded focus ... to exclusion of ..." is pistic commitment, which idolises the economic aspect and completely overlooks the juridical aspect.
[p.73] ... it created a climate in which governments could value currency and exchange rate stability above all else. [pistic functioning in valuing something "above all else". The "climate" in which this was possible for governments, is a societal pistic structure, namely prevailing beliefs that go unquestioned.]
[p.73] The gold standard would ultimately fail because its values were not consistent with those of society. [Holding of values is part of pistic functioning: commitment to what is deemed ultimately meaningful and good. "those of society" is the pistic climate. "Consistent with" is aesthetic functioning.]
It prioritised international ... over domestic ... external stability conflicted with domestic financial prudence ... burden falling ever more heavily on employment. [These indicate the aspectual targets of the pistic prioritisation. Stability is aesthetic. Prudence is economic and inappropriate burden is juridical. Those two aspects were overlooked.
The system finally broke down with the First World War. [It often takes a disaster to bring about a change in pistic functioning, especially where idolisation of one aspect and overlooking of others, has been involved. Mere reason or incentives seldom impact pistic functioning.]
[p.76] This in turn requires public understanding, which is built through transparency with accountability, and it requires consent which is grounded in solidarity, including a fair sharing of the burdens of adjustments. [Public understanding is lingual and pistic (belief). Transparency is lingual functioning. Accountability and fair sharing are juridical functioning. Consent and solidarity are social functionings.]
[p.76] The history of the gold standard teaches that the values underpinning the value of money extend well beyond trust to include transparency, accountability, solidarity and reslience. [Carney's summary-conclusion of the chapter] [Multiple aspects here. Trust is ethical with pistic. Transparency is lingual. Accountability is juridical. Solidarity is social. Resilience is formative (with physical analogy).

Conclusion on Currency

We can see how our economic activity of various kinds (our functioning in the economic aspect), is intimately interwoven with functioning in other aspects. The usefulness of such an analysis is first to clarify and separate out issues, so that they don't become confused or unhelpfully tied to others. Having done that, we might then begin to understand more clearly the roots of problems.

The gold standard has been used as an example. Mark Carney argues that what gave money is value when based on the gold standard was the same as what gives its value today - the same issues of trust, confidence and consent - which we view as ethical, pistic and social aspects.

With the gold standard, we have come to the borderline between the traditional divide of micro from macro economics - the economics of individuals, households and firms, from the economics of nations. Dooyeweerd's aspects can help there too.

NATIONAL FINANCES

In CHapter 4, Mark Carney discusses the reasons why Magna Carta came about, especially those related to the economy of the day. Apparently, there had been high inflation (est. 20% per annum) [p.81], and the imposition by King John of taxes and new regimes. When the King lost his control of lands in Normandy, he had to return to live in England, and the Barons "did not much like the closer observation of their activities the eyeing of their stockpiles of silver that this proximity entailed" [p.79]. This led to the King being forced to agree the now-famous Magna Carta.

Carney discusses the economic aspect of this process (while acknowledging other aspects) and it is instructive to see how many other aspects he mentions as relating to, and leading to, the economic functioning. He mentions five different things (of which he enumerates only the first three explicitly), and we can see various aspects in play at each:

These aspectual dysfunctions impacted the economic aspect of the nation's life ("the economy"). There will have been other aspects, which Mark Carney's telling of the economic aspect of the Magna Carta story has not revealed. Notice how, even though this is to do with national economics, it is individuals functioning in these aspects, especially the three later aspects of pistic, ethical and juridical, that constitutes macro economic activity. It is not some non-human 'brain' in the nation as such.

Moreover, it is largely dysfunctions in these three later aspects that affected not only the economy but also other areas of life that instigated Magna Carta, such as social relationships and relative status (king v barons), and the harmony (aesthetic aspect) between king, barons, sheriffs and the people.

Conclusion

This example shows that it is the very same aspects that affect the micro-level as the macro-level of the economy, though perhaps with more emphasis on the later aspects in the macro. If this is so (and good research has yet to be carried out), then Dooyeweerd's aspects are likely to offer a basis on which to understand micro and macro economics together. It is likely that the pistic, ethical and juridical aspects will especially evident in macro economics.


First created 13 July 2021 with gold standard. Last updated: 14 July 2021 currency, coinage, bank notes. 16 July 2021 Macro economic and Magna Carta; made aspects bold.